A technology for everyone?

It is often said that modern communication technology levels the playing field. Rich or poor, educated or not, Indian, Chinese or American, all can now own or use a cell phone or a computer. Furthermore, the expectation is that the more pervasive digital communication will be, the more likely that it will be used for the greater good. This might be true, but it depends very much on how you define “good”

From London to Kabul, Afghanistan, to Jakarta, Indonesia, the digital revolution has given unprecedented access to information — accurate or not — to anyone with enough money to buy a secondhand cell phone. Where faxes and coffeehouse leaflets were once the lifelines of protest organizers, a new generation of technology has taken hold, doing for the speed and scope of global communication what airplanes did for travel.

Real-world conflicts such as the cartoons controversy almost instantly echo in cyberspace. Radical Islamic Web sites feature photos of beheadings and calls to violence. A posting on one, alghorabaa.net, called for an “embassy-burning day” to protest the Muhammad cartoons and offered wording supporters could use in a text-messaging campaign urging people to throw molotov cocktails and storm embassies, according to the Jamestown Foundation, a U.S. group that monitors such sites. [More… from washingtonpost.com Highlights – MSNBC.com]

Sorin Adam Matei

Assistant Vice President for Partnerships in Strategic Defense Innnovation and Professor of Communication at Purdue University, Director of the FORCES initiative leads research teams that study the relationship between technological and social systems using big data, simulation, and mapping approaches. He published papers and articles in Journal of Communication, Communication Research, Information Society, National Interest, and Foreign Policy. He is the author or co-editor of several books. The most recent is Structural differentation in social media. He also co-edited Ethical Reasoning in Big Data,Transparency in social media and Roles, Trust, and Reputation in Social Media Knowledge Markets: Theory and Methods (Computational Social Sciences) , all three the product of the NSF funded KredibleNet project. Dr. Matei's teaching portfolio includes technology and strategy, online interaction, and digital media analytics classes. A former BBC World Service journalist, his contributions have been published in Esquire and several leading Romanian newspapers. In Romania, he is known for his books Boierii Mintii (The Mind Boyars), Idolii forului (Idols of the forum), and Idei de schimb (Spare ideas).

One thought on “A technology for everyone?

  • Scott Sanders

    Technology can be scary. However, hate campaigns, while disturbing, are hardly the most frightening way for this technology to be used. I’m waiting to see the first true smart mob. The idea is relatively simple; individuals equipped with cellphones or wireless devices are able to communicate while gathered as a mob and coordinate actions in an unprecedented way. The result would be a group that would be highly resistant to police tactics because the technology could be used to evade or counteract police efforts. For example, the police are on State St. so everyone would avoid State St. and meet at the Union. Individuals could take seperate routes but regroup at points specified via a text message. In some ways this is reminiscent of the flash mobs of a few years ago. Imagine what would happen if this technique was used by violent protesters.

    http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/08/04/flash.mob/

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *