Social Media

Group responsible for 2010 Wikileaks Denial of Service attacks against Amazon and Visa splits, reveals power elite, confirms main ideas of Virtual sociability book

The hacktivist group Anonymous, which was recently in the news for its strong-armed support of Wikileaks, is in the middle of a mini civil war. A group of secessionist members has revealed the online identities and other details (Ip addresses) of some of the “leaders” of this hacker organization. Anonymous is the group of hackers that has been responsible for a number of denial of service attacks against several corporate sites that refused to serve as fundraising and money conduits for Wikileaks.

The dissenter group claims that those that they “outed” act like a self-anointed elite.  The group was founded with the expectation that none of the members would have more power or be of higher status than others.

A self-styled Anonymous “splinter group” that has seized control of two sites used by the ‘hacktivist’ collective to organise Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks and other operations have revealed their intentions in an exclusive interview with thinq_.

‘Ryan’, a former member of network staff on AnonOps.net and AnonOps.ru, says that he and and a number of other disgruntled members seized control of the sites because they believed AnonOps had become too centralised.

Anonymous with Guy Fawkes masks at Scientology...
Demonstrators who support Anonymous march in Los Angeles wearing the mask of Guy Fawkes. The London XVIIth prototerrorist is celebrated in the movie V, which espouses ideals, such as a radical subversion of corporate world and official establishment, which some Anonymous members embrace. The march above was occasioned by a protest against the Church of Scientology, which Anonymous blames of conspiring to limit freedom of expression online. Image via Wikipedia

They accuse a small elite within the organisation of “behind-the-scenes string-pulling”, abusing their power by setting themselves up in a leadership role.

The group condemns ‘Owen’, a key figure in this leadership cabal, as being “incredibly incompetent”, stating that had been “abusing the fact that people use his platform”.

Owen and others, the group said, had “crossed the barrier, involving themselves in a leadership role,” adding: “That’s not how things were set up.”

This development comes in the wake of a recent investigative reporting post by Gawker, which revealed that Anonymous has a definite hierarchy obsessed with a vainglorious search for power.

They show a collective of ecstatic and arrogant activists driven to a frenzy by a sense of their own power—they congratulated one another when Hosni Mubarak resigned, as though Anonymous was responsible—and contain bald admissions of criminal behavior that could serve as powerful evidence in criminal proceedings if the internet handles are ever linked to actual people.

 

The event is a wonderful illustration for the theme of a book I coedited with Brian Britt and I  launched only last week. Virtual Sociability: From Community to Communitas (which can be downloaded from Smashwords, or bought from Kindle, or as a paperback from Amazon.com) analyzes the recurrent theme of the intrinsic “democratic” and “equalizing” effect of online communities. The papers by a group of scholars and graduate students grouped around the Online Interaction Seminar at Purdue University, which I have been directing since 2003, reveal that online communities are quite well structured and hierarchically organized. In addition, the papers indicate that online groups are

Virtual Sociability: First volume of the collected papers of the Online Interaction Seminar Collected Papers
Virtual Sociability: First volume of the collected papers of the Online Interaction Seminar Collected Papers

also unstable and liable to change be definition. They are identified not as communities, but as “communitas”. This is a term introduced in sociology by Victor Turner and it designates a state of social aggregation that is meant to help individuals advance between the various layers of a social hierachy. The term is close semantically to an “initiation ritual.” The papers explore, with other means and in other ways, ideas I have proposed in From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Virtual Community Discourse and the Dilemma of Modernity published in Journal of Computer Mediated Communication.

 

Sorin Adam Matei

Assistant Vice President for Partnerships in Strategic Defense Innnovation and Professor of Communication at Purdue University, Director of the FORCES initiative leads research teams that study the relationship between technological and social systems using big data, simulation, and mapping approaches. He published papers and articles in Journal of Communication, Communication Research, Information Society, National Interest, and Foreign Policy. He is the author or co-editor of several books. The most recent is Structural differentation in social media. He also co-edited Ethical Reasoning in Big Data,Transparency in social media and Roles, Trust, and Reputation in Social Media Knowledge Markets: Theory and Methods (Computational Social Sciences) , all three the product of the NSF funded KredibleNet project. Dr. Matei's teaching portfolio includes technology and strategy, online interaction, and digital media analytics classes. A former BBC World Service journalist, his contributions have been published in Esquire and several leading Romanian newspapers. In Romania, he is known for his books Boierii Mintii (The Mind Boyars), Idolii forului (Idols of the forum), and Idei de schimb (Spare ideas).

One thought on “Group responsible for 2010 Wikileaks Denial of Service attacks against Amazon and Visa splits, reveals power elite, confirms main ideas of Virtual sociability book

  • Robert BrunoRobert N. YalePamela MorrisScott SandersCartea fe?elorHoward Sypher I think I see a connection here… Don’t you think so?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *