Wednesday, August 12, 2026 Strategy, technology, media, and social systems

I Think

Sorin Adam Matei

Analysis, research, maps, and essays from Sorin Adam Matei.

A great explanation for how peer-review, open science, and academic journal publishing clash with each other

A very bright and concise way of explaining the economic implications of the peer-review process

Open science, Freedom of Information and the Big Journal monopoly | by Martin Robbins @mjrobbins | Science | guardian.co.uk

Peer-review is a privatized industry in which public interest is an externality. The public pay for raw research to be performed, but we don’t pay for the peer-review or publishing necessary to turn it into the finished article – published research. Instead, academic journals are in the business of refining raw product and selling the result. In this case, the refined product is sold back to the research institutions who subscribe to it. Nobody pays for public access, and there’s no great incentive for publishers to provide it.

Join the discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *